![]() ![]()
#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #53 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s. #52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s. #33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. ![]() #32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #31 getting avg benchmarks for device 9196 +0s. #29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #27 getting avg benchmarks for device 6685 +0s. #25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s. #24 getting avg benchmarks for device 11360 +0.003s. #21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s. #6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s. #5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s. #4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13:13:24 +0200 +0s. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller #Helio p70 vs snapdragon 425 Bluetooth#300 Mbps), GPS (Qualcomm IZat Gen8C Lite), LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, eMMC 5.1Īdreno 506 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. WLAN 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/EDGE, WCDMA, UMTS/HSPA, LTE Cat. The power consumption of the chip is ranging in the lower range, and therefore it is also suited for smaller smartphones. #Helio p70 vs snapdragon 425 1080p#Futhermore, the SoC is able to decode 1080p videos in H.265 (encode only in H.264) and cameras with up to 13 MP. The integrated wireless radios support WiFi 802.11ac Wave 2, Bluetooth 4.1, GPS/GLONASS/Baidou, 2G, 3G and 4G (LTE Cat.4) standards. The integrated Adreno 308 ist the integrated graphics card that supports OpenGL ES 3.0. According to ARM the performance per MHz is a lot better and even surpasses a Cortex-A9 core. #Helio p70 vs snapdragon 425 64 Bit#The A53 is now capable of 64 Bit (ARMv8-ISA) and adressing more than 4 GB RAM. The Cortex-A53 is the successor of the entry level Cortex-A7 CPU cores. 667 MHz) and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE included in the chip. Furthermore, there is a Adreno 308 graphics card, a LPDDR3 memory controller (max. It was announced in February 2016 and integrates four 64-Bit Cortex-A53 CPU cores (quad-core) that clock with up to 1.4 GHz. #Helio p70 vs snapdragon 425 android#The Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (8917) is an ARM-based entry level SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) ► remove from comparison Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 13 MP Camera and front camera of 5 MP Camera whereas latter has primary camera of 8 MP (f/2 and front camera of 5 MP (f/2.2).Ĭheck detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Former comes up with battery of Li-Po 3500 mAh battery and latter with Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh battery. Lava X2 comes up with internal storage of 32GB and RAM of 2 GB. 10.or D comes up with internal storage of 32 GB and RAM of 3 GB. 10.or D starts at ₹ 5,999 and Lava X2 starts at ₹ 6,999.ġ0.or D has screen size of 5.2 inches and Lava X2 has screen size of 6.5 inches. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in india, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. ![]() Should you buy 10.or D or Lava X2? Well, your search ends here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |